The REAL Reasons For Vaccine Mandates – Money of Course
by Phyllis Schlafly

A recent issue of JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association, 12-27-00) reports on a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study that supports the widespread policy of forcing all children to be vaccinated in order to enter daycare or school. It makes the unsurprising claim that unvaccinated children are more likely to get measles and pertussis than those who are vaccinated.

The study used Colorado data because that is one of 15 states that allow parents a so-called philosophical exemption in addition to the religious and medical exemptions that other states allow.
Only 1.4 percent claimed this exemption and more than 98 percent of Colorado children were vaccinated in the year cited by the study.

The CDC has declared that the United States has been free from indigenous measles since 1998 and the only cases come in with immigrants. Vaccination is not effective in about 5 percent of children, so when there is a measles outbreak, most of the cases are among vaccinated children.
The researchers had to go back more than ten years to find sufficient cases for the Colorado study and include a measles epidemic. If the researchers wanted to discuss current risks accurately, they should have focused on immigrants and ineffective vaccinations rather than on children whom they disdainfully call “exemptors.”

It appears that the “experts” and the “authorities” won’t be happy until there is 100 percent compliance with vaccine mandates. The real purpose of the report in JAMA seems to be to shame or scare the 1 to 2 percent of parents into not using a philosophical exemption and to induce states to repeal this exemption.

The same issue of JAMA includes an editorial commenting on the study. It, too, is based on the premise that vaccine mandates are good, and it deplores criticisms of vaccines by parents, implying that their objections must be based on ignorance or misinformation.

But buried in the JAMA editorial are some startling comments and revelations.

Vaccine mandates go into effect in America in a procedure that evades accountability.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first licenses the vaccine as safe; then the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that the vaccine be given to all children; then state legislatures specify which vaccines and how many doses are required (or authorize a state health agency to do this).

JAMA absolves ACIP, CDC and FDA from any accountability for the mandating of vaccines. The editorial says, “It is not the responsibility of these advisory bodies to determine which vaccines are mandated; that decision resides with the state.”

In other words, state legislators take note. You should not mandate a vaccine just because FDA licenses it or ACIP recommends it; you are responsible to make your own decisions and you cannot pass the buck to FDA, ACIP or CDC.
So why do ACIP and FDA so gratuitously recommend so many vaccines for all children?

JAMA’s editorial reveals the answer:
These recommendations are monetary decisions masquerading as medical decisions.

Here are JAMA’s words: “Since federal funding for vaccines is determined by the ACIP through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, whenever possible the ACIP should endorse funding for vaccines that physicians and parents wish to administer.”

In other words, the real purpose of ACIP and FDA recommendations is to release federal funds to buy the vaccines from the manufacturers.
Rep. Dan Burton’s (R-IN) investigation last year revealed many conflicts of interest among those who sit on federal panels where they can vote the recommendations that trigger the federal funds.

Many panelists receive financial benefits from the vaccine manufacturers.

JAMA issues a stern caveat to the states: “All vaccines that are licensed and recommended for use in children should not necessarily be legally mandated for day care or school entry. Each state needs to assess each vaccine individually.”

JAMA’s warning continues: “States should determine whether the disease to be prevented by the vaccines is highly contagious, results in significant morbidity and mortality, and poses a major health problem to both the individual and the community.” It’s obvious that these are not the criteria used by the ACIP and FDA in their pronouncements about vaccines.

Many states are now amending their compulsory vaccination laws to add hepatitis B and chicken pox. An independent assessment of these vaccines by a state is unlikely to conclude that they meet the criteria set forth by JAMA.
Rep. Dan Burton should have more hearings to expose the government’s vaccine licensing/recommendation/mandate process. Meanwhile, since the government’s decision-making procedure is not only defective but suspect, we need a philosophical exemption in every state so that decisions can be made by parents whose motive is the health of their children, not promoting government purchases of vaccines.
Independent judgments by states and consumers might have helped to avoid past blunders like the rotavirus vaccine embarrassment last year that caused injuries and death to so many babies. At a minimum, a philosophical exemption in every state would create a market demand for improvement of vaccines.

Eagle Forum Jan. 24, 2001 and JAMA December 27, 2000

DR. MERCOLA’S COMMENT:
Hats off to Phyllis Schlafly for tearing apart the JAMA articles that appeared to justify the need for these vaccines.

Of course, as in most areas of the traditional paradigm, once you break it down, you find that MONEY is the primary motivating influence.

Tagged with:
 

In addition to the viral and bacterial RNA or DNA that is part of the vaccines, here are the fillers:

aluminum hydroxide
aluminum phosphate
ammonium sulfate
amphotericin B
animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
dog kidney, monkey kidney,
chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
calf (bovine) serum
betapropiolactone
fetal bovine serum
formaldehyde
formalin
gelatin
glycerol
human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
hydrolized gelatin
monosodium glutamate (MSG)
neomycin
neomycin sulfate
phenol red indicator
phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
potassium diphosphate
potassium monophosphate
polymyxin B
polysorbate 20
polysorbate 80
porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
residual MRC5 proteins
sorbitol
sucrose
thimerosal (mercury)
tri(n)butylphosphate,
VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells
washed sheep red blood cells

DR. MERCOLA’S COMMENT:
And you thought you were just getting a viral vaccine. In many cases the vaccine additives are far more toxic than the viral component. This is particularly true for thimerosal which is mercury.

Many will say that thimerosol is not in the vaccines any more. Well last summer Congress “strongly recommended” that the Pharmaceutical Company take the thimerosol out of vaccines….it was not mandated; simply recommended. The drug companies were not told to take the existing lots off the market. The recommendations only applies to new product line manufacture. An unknown amount of vaccine was/is still on the shelves.

Now the twist:
Yes, the new vaccines are supposed to be thimerasol-free, but I’m not sure that they are. In addition, it is unknown when you get a vaccination if you are getting a “new lot” or an “old lot.” It is unknown exactly when the new
thimerasol-free vaccines went into effect and were available in the market.

In addition, if you were vaccinated with an old lot, or vaccinated previous to last summer, you got a dose of the mercury.

NOW the ‘big marketing push” for vaccines, in 6 color glossy is “this vaccine is THIMEROSAL-FREE!!!!”….as if they had no idea before last summer that mercury was a problem. And, in response to “YOUR CONCERNS (even tho unfounded), oh faithful followers, we are making a new, and safe vaccine.”

Tagged with:
 

To Vaccinate Or Not

NEW YORK, Dec. 04, 2002

For the 11,000 babies born in the U.S. every day, pediatricians recommend a series of 20 vaccinations protecting against 11 diseases before each child reaches 18 months.

Vaccination rates have climbed to record levels in recent years, indicating that many parents take these recommendations to heart. However, some families still remain fearful.

At six and a half years old, Alexa Richardson has never been immunized. Neither has her two-year-old sister, Erica. Their mother vetoed vaccinations after reading her own baby book.

“I remember looking down and seeing 106 fever, 10 days, unresponsive after one of the immunizations,” says Dawn Richardson. She had bad reactions to her measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, which were separate at the time. She also got sick after receiving smallpox vaccine. Her husband, Scott, has a family history of auto-immune reactions.

Medical reasons kept the Richardsons from immunizing their kids. Others believe shots can lead to neurological problems, such as autism. Some fear serious medical problems like cancer, which can lead to death. In some areas, people still lack access to treatment and some avoid their shots for religious and other personal reasons.

Overall, only one percent of American children are not immunized. But in three states: Michigan, Washington and Wisconsin, that rate rises above two percent.

Dawn Richardson has others thinking about the issue in her role as president of “Prove” (Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education.)

“I think that parents need to really think about medical advice that’s one-size-fits-all, whether it’s for a vaccine or something else, they need to look at their individual child,” she says.

Each state has its own immunization requirements for children entering public schools. Exceptions are easier to obtain in some states than in others. In Washington, California and Colorado, for instance, parents can get exceptions by simply signing a form provided by local schools.

Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, says parents need to be careful and do plenty of research about their family medical history before getting their children vaccinated.

Outside of vaccine companies and doctors – who all make money from manufacturing and administering shots – few members of society champion the cause of vaccines. Part of the issue is that vaccines have entered a new era.

Fear Of Neurological Problems

During the mid-1900s, as they slowly annihilated polio, smallpox, diphtheria and a host of other fatal diseases, vaccines were seen as lifesavers. Compared with such scourges, the occasional problems that arose from vaccine impurities or manufacturing defects looked small.

But today, children are routinely vaccinated against diseases that are considered either trivial or unusual, such as chicken pox, meningitis or pneumococcal disease. The benefits of such vaccines seem smaller, so society looks at potential risks with a fresh and wary eye.

Another problem is the pseudo-scientification of medical myths. For example, in the 1990s, some scientists became concerned about the level of mercury in vaccines. For decades, vaccine makers used a preservative called thimerosal, which contains a small amount of mercury. Since mercury is a known neurotoxin, which in large doses can cause brain damage, the U.S. and other Western governments told manufacturers to remove it from their products.

Vaccine critics blame this mercury content for the apparent rise in cases of autism in the United States and England. A recent study published in the Lancet medical journal showed the blood mercury levels of infants who received vaccines that contained thimerosal were well below all the safety levels set by government agencies.

The Lancet study looked at 61 infants, most having blood-mercury levels below 2 nanograms per milliliter after vaccination; the highest safety limit, set by the Environmental Protection Agency, is 5.8 nanograms. Some critics counter that the study was too small and that delays in testing some of the infants may have missed the peak blood-mercury levels. In an effort to address some of these issues, another study of 200 children is going on in Argentina.

The connection between vaccination and autistic behavior, first reported in “DPT: A Shot in the Dark” (Coulter & Fisher, 1985) 15 years ago is now being discussed in medical literature. This enhanced public awareness has been fueled by persistent reports by parents in the U.S., Canada and Europe that their children were healthy, bright and happy until they received one or more vaccines and then descended into the isolated, painful world of autism, marked by chronic immune and neurological dysfunction, including repetitive and uncontrollable behavior.

Conservative estimates are that about 500,000 Americans are autistic but that number is growing daily, with new evidence that perhaps as many as 1 in 150 children are suffering from autism spectrum disorder that can include a range of neurological, behavior and immune system dysfunction.

The incidence of autism, like that of learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), asthma, diabetes, arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune and neurological disorders, has risen dramatically in the U.S. and other technologically advanced countries, while high vaccination rates have caused the incidence of childhood infectious diseases to fall just as dramatically in these countries. Instead of epidemics of infectious disease, there are now epidemics of chronic disease.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says that immunizing a child is far more beneficial than not immunizing. Recent studies show that infants immunized with vaccines preserved with mercury-based thimerosal had blood mercury levels below current safety limits and that children’s bodies get rid of that form of mercury much more quickly than was believed.

For information about vaccine compensation, call:
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Health Resources and Services Administration
Parklawn Building, Room 8-05
600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (800) 338-2382 (24-hour recording)

Persons wishing to file a claim for vaccine injury should call or write to: U.S. Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 219-9657.

Tagged with: