In addition to the viral and bacterial RNA or DNA that is part of the vaccines, here are the fillers:

aluminum hydroxide
aluminum phosphate
ammonium sulfate
amphotericin B
animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
dog kidney, monkey kidney,
chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
calf (bovine) serum
betapropiolactone
fetal bovine serum
formaldehyde
formalin
gelatin
glycerol
human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
hydrolized gelatin
monosodium glutamate (MSG)
neomycin
neomycin sulfate
phenol red indicator
phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
potassium diphosphate
potassium monophosphate
polymyxin B
polysorbate 20
polysorbate 80
porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
residual MRC5 proteins
sorbitol
sucrose
thimerosal (mercury)
tri(n)butylphosphate,
VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells
washed sheep red blood cells

DR. MERCOLA’S COMMENT:
And you thought you were just getting a viral vaccine. In many cases the vaccine additives are far more toxic than the viral component. This is particularly true for thimerosal which is mercury.

Many will say that thimerosol is not in the vaccines any more. Well last summer Congress “strongly recommended” that the Pharmaceutical Company take the thimerosol out of vaccines….it was not mandated; simply recommended. The drug companies were not told to take the existing lots off the market. The recommendations only applies to new product line manufacture. An unknown amount of vaccine was/is still on the shelves.

Now the twist:
Yes, the new vaccines are supposed to be thimerasol-free, but I’m not sure that they are. In addition, it is unknown when you get a vaccination if you are getting a “new lot” or an “old lot.” It is unknown exactly when the new
thimerasol-free vaccines went into effect and were available in the market.

In addition, if you were vaccinated with an old lot, or vaccinated previous to last summer, you got a dose of the mercury.

NOW the ‘big marketing push” for vaccines, in 6 color glossy is “this vaccine is THIMEROSAL-FREE!!!!”….as if they had no idea before last summer that mercury was a problem. And, in response to “YOUR CONCERNS (even tho unfounded), oh faithful followers, we are making a new, and safe vaccine.”

Tagged with:
 

To Vaccinate Or Not

NEW YORK, Dec. 04, 2002

For the 11,000 babies born in the U.S. every day, pediatricians recommend a series of 20 vaccinations protecting against 11 diseases before each child reaches 18 months.

Vaccination rates have climbed to record levels in recent years, indicating that many parents take these recommendations to heart. However, some families still remain fearful.

At six and a half years old, Alexa Richardson has never been immunized. Neither has her two-year-old sister, Erica. Their mother vetoed vaccinations after reading her own baby book.

“I remember looking down and seeing 106 fever, 10 days, unresponsive after one of the immunizations,” says Dawn Richardson. She had bad reactions to her measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, which were separate at the time. She also got sick after receiving smallpox vaccine. Her husband, Scott, has a family history of auto-immune reactions.

Medical reasons kept the Richardsons from immunizing their kids. Others believe shots can lead to neurological problems, such as autism. Some fear serious medical problems like cancer, which can lead to death. In some areas, people still lack access to treatment and some avoid their shots for religious and other personal reasons.

Overall, only one percent of American children are not immunized. But in three states: Michigan, Washington and Wisconsin, that rate rises above two percent.

Dawn Richardson has others thinking about the issue in her role as president of “Prove” (Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education.)

“I think that parents need to really think about medical advice that’s one-size-fits-all, whether it’s for a vaccine or something else, they need to look at their individual child,” she says.

Each state has its own immunization requirements for children entering public schools. Exceptions are easier to obtain in some states than in others. In Washington, California and Colorado, for instance, parents can get exceptions by simply signing a form provided by local schools.

Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, says parents need to be careful and do plenty of research about their family medical history before getting their children vaccinated.

Outside of vaccine companies and doctors – who all make money from manufacturing and administering shots – few members of society champion the cause of vaccines. Part of the issue is that vaccines have entered a new era.

Fear Of Neurological Problems

During the mid-1900s, as they slowly annihilated polio, smallpox, diphtheria and a host of other fatal diseases, vaccines were seen as lifesavers. Compared with such scourges, the occasional problems that arose from vaccine impurities or manufacturing defects looked small.

But today, children are routinely vaccinated against diseases that are considered either trivial or unusual, such as chicken pox, meningitis or pneumococcal disease. The benefits of such vaccines seem smaller, so society looks at potential risks with a fresh and wary eye.

Another problem is the pseudo-scientification of medical myths. For example, in the 1990s, some scientists became concerned about the level of mercury in vaccines. For decades, vaccine makers used a preservative called thimerosal, which contains a small amount of mercury. Since mercury is a known neurotoxin, which in large doses can cause brain damage, the U.S. and other Western governments told manufacturers to remove it from their products.

Vaccine critics blame this mercury content for the apparent rise in cases of autism in the United States and England. A recent study published in the Lancet medical journal showed the blood mercury levels of infants who received vaccines that contained thimerosal were well below all the safety levels set by government agencies.

The Lancet study looked at 61 infants, most having blood-mercury levels below 2 nanograms per milliliter after vaccination; the highest safety limit, set by the Environmental Protection Agency, is 5.8 nanograms. Some critics counter that the study was too small and that delays in testing some of the infants may have missed the peak blood-mercury levels. In an effort to address some of these issues, another study of 200 children is going on in Argentina.

The connection between vaccination and autistic behavior, first reported in “DPT: A Shot in the Dark” (Coulter & Fisher, 1985) 15 years ago is now being discussed in medical literature. This enhanced public awareness has been fueled by persistent reports by parents in the U.S., Canada and Europe that their children were healthy, bright and happy until they received one or more vaccines and then descended into the isolated, painful world of autism, marked by chronic immune and neurological dysfunction, including repetitive and uncontrollable behavior.

Conservative estimates are that about 500,000 Americans are autistic but that number is growing daily, with new evidence that perhaps as many as 1 in 150 children are suffering from autism spectrum disorder that can include a range of neurological, behavior and immune system dysfunction.

The incidence of autism, like that of learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), asthma, diabetes, arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune and neurological disorders, has risen dramatically in the U.S. and other technologically advanced countries, while high vaccination rates have caused the incidence of childhood infectious diseases to fall just as dramatically in these countries. Instead of epidemics of infectious disease, there are now epidemics of chronic disease.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says that immunizing a child is far more beneficial than not immunizing. Recent studies show that infants immunized with vaccines preserved with mercury-based thimerosal had blood mercury levels below current safety limits and that children’s bodies get rid of that form of mercury much more quickly than was believed.

For information about vaccine compensation, call:
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Health Resources and Services Administration
Parklawn Building, Room 8-05
600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
Telephone: (800) 338-2382 (24-hour recording)

Persons wishing to file a claim for vaccine injury should call or write to: U.S. Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 219-9657.

Tagged with:
 

Adapte su Estilo de Comunicación

Para mejorar las comunicaciones con sus colegas, personal, jefes o clientes, Ud. debe estar conciente que las personas son diferentes, por lo que un único método de comunicación no es el más apropiado para interactuar con todas ellas. La empresa consultora Professional Development Ass. Inc. de Canadá asegura que Ud. obtendrá mejores resultados y será más eficaz si adapta su estilo de comunicación al deseado por las otras personas. Para dominar esta flexibilidad, Ud. tendrá que practicar un poco variando su estilo de comunicación según cada tipo de persona. Esta flexibilidad y la habilidad de interpretar las necesidades de las otras personas son la marca de un comunicador superior.

Según la empresa mencionada, existen básicamente cuatro estilos de comunicación que dependen de los tipos de persona. A continuación se presentan las sugerencias para comunicarse con cada una de ellas:

1. Al comunicarse con una persona que es ambiciosa, poderosa, decisiva, de carácter fuerte, independiente y orientada a las metas:

-Sea claro, específico, breve y vaya al grano.

-Apéguese al asunto.

-Esté preparado con el material de apoyo en un “paquete” bien organizado.
Factores que crearán tensión o descontento:

-Hablar sobre cosas que no son pertinentes al asunto.

-Salir con evasivas o problemas difusos o poco claros.

- Aparecer desorganizado.

2. Al comunicarse con una persona que es magnética, entusiasta, amistosa, demostrativa y política:

-Proporcione un ambiente cálido y amistoso.

-No trate con muchos detalles (póngalos por escrito).

-Haga preguntas con “sensibilidad” para delinear sus opiniones o comentarios.

Factores que crearán tensión o descontento:

-Ser cortante, frío o poco comunicativo.

-Controlar la conversación.

-Basarse sólo en hechos, cifras, alternativas, abstracciones.

3. Al comunicarse con una persona que es paciente, predecible, confiable, relajada y modesta:

-Empiece con un comentario personal para romper el hielo.

-Presente su caso suavemente, sin amenazas o coerción.

-Haga la pregunta “¿cómo…?” para obtener sus opiniones.

Factores que crearán tensión o descontento:

-Apresurarse, entrar de frente en el asunto.

-Ser dominante o exigente.

-Obligarlos a que respondan rápidamente a sus objetivos.

4. Al comunicarse con una persona que es dependiente, nítida, conservadora, perfeccionista, cuidadosa y complaciente:

-Prepare su “caso” de antemano.

-Apéguese al asunto.

-Sea exacto y realista.

Factores que crearán tensión o descontentos:

-Ser frívolo, casual, informal, ruidoso.

-Ser desorganizado.

-Presionar demasiado fuerte o ser poco realista con las fechas topes.

La Forma Activa de Escuchar

Podemos comunicar aceptación con gestos, posturas u otros comportamientos. “El no decir nada también puede comunicar con toda claridad aceptación. El silencio, forma pasiva de escuchar, constituye un fuerte mensaje no verbal y puede ser utilizado eficazmente para hacer que una persona se sienta aceptada realmente.”

Generalmente la forma eficaz para escuchar a un compañero de VENCEDORES es la forma activa de escuchar. El comunicador cuenta un problema y los sentimientos que éste ocasiona. El oyente, después de escuchar, le da un mensaje que refleja el sentimiento del comunicador. El comunicador tiene la oportunidad de negar o afirmar la declaración de reflexión del oyente. Esto lo ayudará a tomar responsabilidad de sus sentimientos, pensamientos y acciones. En realidad el oyente actúa como un espejo para el comunicador. Habiéndose visto en la respuesta del oyente, el comunicador puede aceptar su situación.

La forma activa de escuchar no es…

• Mandar, dirigir u ordenar.

• Advertir, amonestar o amenazar.

• Exhortar, sermonear o dar una lección.

• Aconsejar, solucionar o sugerir.

• Dar conferencias, enseñanza o argumentos lógicos.

• Criticar, juzgar o culpar.

• Estar de acuerdo.

• Avergonzar o burlarse.

• Interpretar, analizar o diagnosticar.

• Justificar, racionalizar o consolar.

• Probar, preguntar o interrogar.

• Minimizar el problema.

• Distraer, hacer reír, entretener.

• Halagar, hacer cumplidos o dar palmaditas.

Estrategias para escuchar activamente

Estas frases nos ayudan a expresar nuestro interés en y nuestra aceptación de quienes escuchamos.

• “Esto te habrá dolido mucho.”

• “Parece que tienes motivo para haberte enojado.”

• “Tienes el derecho de sentir ____________.”

• “Gracias por compartir, Roberto.”

• “Tu valor en compartir esto me anima.”

• “También me enojaría si me pasara lo mismo.”

• “Nadie tiene que tolerar el abuso.”

• “Tal cosa puede confundirnos tanto.”

• “Ha de ser difícil.”

• “Lo que dijiste me inspiró mucho. Gracias.”

• “Se nota que estás trabajando los pasos, Julián.”

• “La oración funciona, ¿verdad?”

• “Gracias a Dios.”

• “¡Qué bueno! Me da gusto.”

• “Me identifico contigo.”

En los grupos de los Doce Pasos, no damos consejos. Solamente contamos nuestras propias historias. Compartimos nuestras propias luchas, fracasos y éxitos. Además, en grupos de recuperación cristianos como VENCEDORES, tenemos la oportunidad de compartir cómo Cristo está obrando en nuestras vidas y cómo los Doce Pasos facilitan nuestro discipulado cristiano.

Mensajes Yo

En recuperación, nos enfocamos en nosotros mismos. Soy responsable de mis pensamientos, mis sentimientos y mis acciones. Por eso, usamos la técnica de “mensajes yo”. cuando usamos “mensajes tú”, acusamos a la otra persona y provocamos una reacción defensiva en ella. Generalmente esto impide que nos oiga. Con “mensajes yo,” la otra persona no se siente atacada y no tiene necesidad de defenderse. Por eso, nos puede oír. A través de este tipo de mensaje personal, compartimos nuestra experiencia, fortaleza y esperanza.

Así la persona con el problema no se siente forzada. Está en plena libertad de probar la solución dada por el otro o no.

Tagged with: